Dismissed

Mr. Vijay Mansharam Garela v. Mrs. Palakh v Garela

Bombay HC29 Aug 2016WP/4014/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge disposed of a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a Family Court order directing the husband to pay medical expenses. The Petitioner was ordered to clear the entire amount by a deadline, failing which the Respondent can pursue recovery.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to clear entire medical expenses by 30.9.2016; petition dismissed; Civil Application dismissed as infructuous.

Mr. Vijay Mansharam Garela Vs Mrs. Palakh v. Garela — Maintenance and Alimony | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

43 wp4014-15

¶2

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.4014 OF 2015 WITH

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.695 OF 2016

¶6

Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶7

Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh for the petitioner

¶8

Ms.Vimla R. Vora for the respondent

¶9

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : AUGUST 29, 2016

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

2 By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner husband challenges the order dated 21.1.2015 passed by Family Court, Mumbai at Bandra in Interim Application No.19 of 2015 in Petition A-8 of 2010 directing petitioner husband to clear the medical expenses of Rs.3,81,642/- with 9% interest. 3 Office note shows that pursuant to the order passed by this court, till today petitioner has paid sum of Rs.2.0 lacs only. It is to be noted that petitioner and respondent entered into Consent Terms Exhibit-E dated 25.5.2011 in which the

Mohite

1/2

43 wp4014-15

petitioner husband agreed to pay maintenance of Rs.2,000/- p.m. from June, 2011 to the wife and also agreed to pay medical expenses. Hence, respondent wife claimed sum of Rs.3,81,642/which was spent by her on medical expenses.

¶17

4 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the earlier orders passed by this court by which the petitioner paid sum of Rs.2.0 lacs to the respondent wife, I am of the opinion that it is not possible to prolong this litigation as the petitioner is asking time again and again. Hence, following order is passed:

¶18

a) Petitioner to clear entire amount of medical expenses as per order dated 21.1.2015 passed by Family Court at Bandra below Exhibit-51 in Interim Application No.19 of 2015 on or before 30.9.2016, failing which respondent wife is entitled to proceed with Recovery Application No.288 of 2015 according to law. b) Petition stand disposed of accordingly. c) In view thereof, Civil Application does not survive. The same is also dismissed as infructuous.

¶19

JUDGE

¶20

Mohite

¶21

2/2

Mr. Vijay Mansharam Garela v. Mrs. Palakh v Garela

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Vijay Mansharam Garela v. Mrs. Palakh v Garela

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Hiro Rekhani Vs M/S Well Wisher Constructions and Finance Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Smt. Rajeshree Dasharath Karve Nee Mr. Rajeshree Sharmandas Pardeshi Vs Ajib Investments Private Limited and Ors.

Rushabh Ashish Chs Ltd. Vs Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar and Ors.

Mrs. Yugandhara Nitin Pagde Vs Shri. Nitin Manohar Pagde and Ors.

Meenakshi Vivek Gawade Vs Vivek Bhagwan Gawade and Anr.

Suresh Kumar Singh Vs Neelkamal Singh