Suresh Kumar Singh v. Neelkamal Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Application found to be infructuous in view of subsequent developments and disposed accordingly. No substantive legal issue determined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18 caw1104-16
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1104 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.119 OF 2014
ffice Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.Shashi D. Pandey for the applicant
Ms.Seema Sarnaik for the respondent
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : AUGUST 29, 2016
P.C.:
2 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that entire arrears of maintenance is already paid to the respondent.
3 The learned counsel for the respondent submits that in view of subsequent development nothing survives in the Civil Application. Same stands disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE
Mohite
1/1
Shashi D. Pandey
Seema Sarnaik
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court