In view of the investigation agency's statement accepting completion of investigation and proposal to file B-Summary, leave to withdraw the writ petition by the petitioners was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 20
WP 116.15
SSK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 116 OF 2015
Shri Dinanath Raghunath Walawalkar and ors. ….Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra and ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Aaditya Gore, advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & A. S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATED : 27th JANUARY, 2015.
P.C.:
Mrs. Deshmukh, learned APP, on the basis of instructions given by Mr.Someshwar Kamthe, P.I. Vanrai Police Station, Goregaon East, makes a statement that the investigation into FIR No.299 of 2013 is competed and investigating agency proposes to file B-Summary report as far as petitioners are concerned. The statement is accepted.
(A. S. GADKARI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Shri Dinanath Raghunath Walawalkar and ors.
State of Maharashtra and ors.
RANJIT MORE
A. S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
