Dismissed
Dhananjay Kishor Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCWP/383/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp383.14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 383 OF 2014
Dhananjay s/o Kishor Patil .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra .. RESPONDENT
Mr. A.P. Sonpethkar, advocate holding for Mr. P.N. Sonpethkar, advocate for petitioner.
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the State.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 609 OF 2014
Dhananjay s/o Kishor Patil .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra .. RESPONDENT
Mr. A.P. Sonpethkar, advocate holding for Mr. P.N. Sonpethkar, advocate for petitioner.
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw both the petitions since the original application tendered by petitioner is disposed of by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
At the request of learned counsel for petitioner, both the petitions are permitted to be withdrawn and the are disposed of accordingly.
( K. K. SONAWANE ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb
Dhananjay s/o Kishor Patil
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court