Coram disposed of Writ Petition No. 3621 of 2015 as infructuous upon counsel stating relief had become meaningless. Consequently, the associated Civil Application No. 4140 of 2015 was also disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP-3621.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3621 OF 2015
Saibaba Ropwatika Seva Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. Wagdari and others ...PETITIONER
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ...RESPONDENTS
Mrs Kalpana Kulkarni, Advocate holding for Mr. Sunil P. Sonpawale, Advocate for petitioners Mrs.A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondents No. 1 to 4
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4140 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3621 OF 2015
Swarjansingh Shivpalsingh Parihar ...APPLICANT
versus
Saibaba Ropwatika Seva Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. Wagdari and others ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. V.A. Bagal, Advocate for applicant Mrs.A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondents No. 1 to 4
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 1st JULY, 2016.
Order :-
passage of time relief claimed in writ petition has become infructuous.
2 WP-3621.15
Sd/-
Sd/-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
MTK
Saibaba Ropwatika Seva Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. Wagdari
The State of Maharashtra
Swarjansingh Shivpalsingh Parihar
K. K. SONAWANE
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
