Keshav Raj Kranthi, the Director, Central Institute of Cotton Reserch and Another v. Nitin Nandkishore Zade
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3579.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3579 OF 2015 Shri Keshav Raj Kranthi and anr
..vs..
Nitin Nandkishore Zade
....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's Order
Shri R.S. Sundaram, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. I.K. JAIN, JJ. DATED : JUNE 27, 2016.
Heard.
As Contempt Petition No.2010 of 2013 is dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench at Nagpur on 30.3.2016, learned counsel Dr. R.S. Sundaram for the petitioners submits that the challenge in this writ petition is rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as
infructuous.
JUDGE JUDGE
!! BRW !!
...../-
Shri Keshav Raj Kranthi and anr
Nitin Nandkishore Zade
B.P. Dharhadhikari
Kum. I.K. Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court