Vikas Nandlal Rai v. the State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Yavatmal and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2406cwp100.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2014
(Vikas Nandlal Rai vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PSO, PS Yavatmal & Ors.) AND
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 743 OF 2015
(Chandan s/o Dilip Trivedi vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PSO, PS Yavatmal (City) & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,_____________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. JUNE 24, 2016.
Heard Shri A.S. Manohar and Shri P.R. Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners in respective petitions, Mrs. K.S. Joshi, learned APP for respondent Nos. 1 & 3 and Shri C.N. Deshpande, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 in both the petitions, for some time.
After hearing the respective counsel, we find that the contentions which raise few points in defence and point of some disputed facts, cannot be looked into here in this jurisdiction for the first time.
Hence, keeping all rival contentions open and with liberty to the petitioners to file such application as they may be advised at appropriate juncture before the trial Court, we dispose of both the petitions.
Needless to mention that interim directions stand
vacated.
JUDGE
*GS.
JUDGE
Vikas Nandlal Rai
Chandan s/o Dilip Trivedi
State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
KUM. INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court