This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.1WP.3526.98
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3526 OF 1998. (Ulhas Pandhari Ganvir .vs. Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.M. Ghodeswar, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 3.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 15, 2016.
In spite of being duly served for engagement of another Counsel, neither the petitioner has appeared nor he has engaged any Counsel.
The petition is, therefore, disposed of for want of prosecution.
Judge Judge J.
Ulhas Pandhari Ganvir
Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project
B.R. GAVAI
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
