The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench allowed miscellaneous applications filed in a writ petition and related matters without reciting specific grounds for the decision.
Applications are allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.1CAO.2055.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.O. NO. 2055/15 & M.C.A. ST. NO. 23173/15 IN C.A. NO. 719/15 IN M.C.A. ST. NO. 2374/13 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4431 OF 2010. (Smt. Sanju wd/o Dhanraj Chakole .vs. Shri Datta Shikshan Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha & another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. R.K. Borkar, Advocate for applicant.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 15, 2016.
For the reasons stated, the applications are allowed.
Judge Judge J.
Smt. Sanju wd/o Dhanraj Chakole
Shri Datta Shikshan Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha
another
B.R. GAVAI
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
