Disposed

Sonali Kamlakar Meshramkar and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC3 May 2016WP/3499/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, directed respondent no.2 to decide the petitioners' representation dated 5th January 2016 on its merits and communicate the decision within four weeks before disposing of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent no.2 to decide the petitioners' representation dated 5th January 2016 on its merits and communicate the decision within four weeks.

Sonali Kamlakar Meshramkar and Another Vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

(1)W.P. No. 3499 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

¶3

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

¶4

Writ Petition No. 3499 of 2016

¶5

`District : Aurangabad`
`1. Sonali d/o. Kamlakar Meshramkar,`
`Age : 29 years,`
`Occupation : Unemployed,`
`R/o. Ashish D. Kale,`
`Bungalow No.28,`
`Cantonment, Chhawani,`
`Mission Compound, Aurangabad.`
`2. Sunny s/o. Viraj Sathe,`
`Age : 27 years,`
`Occupation : unemployed,`
`R/o. House No.1290, Chhawani,`
`Mission Compound, Aurangabad.` `.. Petitioners.`
`versus`
`1. The State of Maharashtra,`
`through its Secretary,`
`Medical Education Department,`
`Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032.`
`2. The Director,`
`Medical Education & Research,`
`Opp. Govt. Dental College Building,`
`St. George's Hospital Compound,`
`4th Floor, Near C.S.T., Mumbai.` `.. Respondents.`
`............` Mr. V.P. Golewar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, Asst. Government Pleader, for
respondent nos.1 and 2.

¶6

............

¶7

(2)W.P. No. 3499 of 2016

¶8

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

¶9

DATE : 3RD MAY 2016

¶10

PER COURT :

¶11

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioners and the learned Asst. Government Pleader
appearing for the respondents.

¶12

2.There is an innocuous prayer in the
petition, inasmuch as the petitioners are seeking
direction to respondent no.2 to consider the
representation dated 5th January 2016, filed by the
petitioners to respondent no.2, within a stipulated
time and communicate the decision thereon to the
petitioners as early as possible.

¶13

3.We direct respondent no.2 to take decision
on the representation dated 5th January 2016, filed
by the petitioners, on its own merits, if already
not decided, as expeditiously as possible, however,
within a period of four weeks from today and
communicate the decision so taken to the petitioner.

¶14

4.With the above directions, the Writ Petition
is disposed of.

¶15

(3)W.P. No. 3499 of 2016

¶16

5.Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of
this order.

¶17

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (S.S. SHINDE)

¶18

 JUDGE JUDGE

¶19

 puranik / WP3499.16

Sonali Kamlakar Meshramkar and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonali Kamlakar Meshramkar and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baban Appa Kolekar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Raghunath Bhimrao Yelave Vs the State of Mahrashtra and Others

Vrandavani Bhagwan Chaudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shivaji Deorao Suryawanshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vinayak Vitthal Jadhav and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Digambar Erappa Manyar Vs the Secretary Rural Development Mantralaya Mumbai and Others