for redressal of grievance after ten years
from the date on which services of the
petitioner came to an end. It is stated
that services of the petitioner with
respondent No.3 had come to an end on 30th
June, 1998 and belatedly after ten years
period on 29thSeptember, 2011, the
petitioner has filed the application
praying for reinstatement of the
petitioner or appointing the petitioner on
any other post than the one occupied by
the petitioner. Apart from aforementioned
observationsintheimpugned
communication, an assertion by the
petitioner that the petitioner has worked
for more than 1262 days on permanent
establishment, has also been denied.
Admittedly, the petitioner approached the
respondents belatedly after ten years.
Whether the petitioner has worked on the
establishment of respondent No.3 for more
than 1262 days raises a disputed question
of fact. In the light of the stand taken
by the respondents that the petitioner has
not worked for the said period on
permanent establishment and the period for
which the petitioner has worked was on
contract basis and the appointment of the
petitioner was not in accordance with the
regularprocedureestablishedfor
