This court disposed of a criminal writ petition regarding a parole appeal. Since the petitioner had already been released on parole, the court was not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders and discharged the rule.
Rule discharged; no interference in the release on parole.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 4.crwp.3311.14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3311 OF 2014
Buvaji Sahadev Hajare
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
None for the Petitioner Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 12, 2016
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]:
The said application came to be dismissed. The appeal preferred against the order of rejection came to be dismissed by order dated 21.1.2014. Hence, this petition.
3 It is seen that thereafter the petitioner has been
1 of 2
jdk 2 4.crwp.3311.14.doc
released on parole on 12.3.2015, hence, we are not inclined to interfere. Rule is discharged.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in the matter after the petitioner was released on parole.
Buvaji Sahadev Hajare
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
