Dismissed
Suresh Shrirang Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/1186/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 3.crwp.1186.14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1186 OF 2014
Suresh Shrirang Chavan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Ms. Sonia Miskin Advocate appointed for Petitioner Mrs. A.S. Pai A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 12, 2016
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]:
1 Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith.
2 The case of the petitioner is that he preferred an application for parole on 27.6.2013 on the ground that he wanted to get his daughter married. The said application was granted on 13.9.2013. The order granting parole to the petitioner stated that he had to furnish surety. According to the petitioner, proposed surety went missing, therefore, the
1 of 2
jdk 2 3.crwp.1186.14.doc
prayer in this petition is that he be released on parole on P.R. Bond.
3 It is seen that thereafter the petitioner has been released on furlough from 20.6.2014 to 3.7.2014 and from 26.2.2015 to 25.3.2015. On both these occasions, the petitioner was released on furlough on furnishing surety. If on these two occasions, the petitioner could furnish surety, we see no impediment for him to furnish surety as far as his application for parole is concerned. In any event, the application for parole was made in the year 2013 and thereafter in the year 2014 and 2015, the petitioner has been released on furlough. During this period, the petitioner could very well search for a suitable bridegroom and make arrangement to get his daughter married. In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner. Hence, rule is discharged.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
Suresh Shrirang Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court