Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a writ petition due to availability of an alternate remedy. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 /1
Nalawade
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Writ Petition (L) No.3491 of 2016
M/s. Mihir Commercial Pvt. Ltd. and ors. ...Petitioners.
vs.
Dombivli Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd.
...Respondent.
Mr. Prathamesh Kamat with Nikhil Rajani i/by Sachin Kaikini for the Petitioners. Mr.Ashutosh Gole for the Respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.S. GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 23rd December, 2016
ORDER:
As the alternate remedy is available to the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is disposed off as withdrawn.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
M/s. Mihir Commercial Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Dombivli Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Anoop V. Mohta
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
