Disposed
Arvind Punjalal Shah v. District Magistrate Thane and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/3157/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 /1
Nalawade
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3157 OF 2016
IN
W.P. NO.13489 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3159 OF 2016 IN W.P. NO.13487 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3160 OF 2016 IN W.P. NO.13488 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s or Judge’s orders Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Prathamesh Kamat i/by V.N. Bolinjkar for the applicants in all the matters. Mr.Rohit Gupta with Ms.S.Gandhi i/by HSA Advocates for the Respondents in all the matters.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.S. GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 23rd December, 2016
ORDER:
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank on instructions submitted that they will not take forcible possession of the property till 4.1.2016. All the applications are disposed off accordingly.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
ANOOP V. MOHTA
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court