Petitioner sought leave to withdraw writ petition No. 3257 of 2015. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the petition as withdrawn, and disposed of the accompanying civil application. Contentions were kept open for future cause of action.
Writ petition and civil application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 3257.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3257 OF 2015 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3977 OF 2015
Prasanna S. Mishrikotkar
.. Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
.. Respondents
Shri Ramesh R. Mantri, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Deshpande, A.S.G. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri B. V. Virdhe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 04TH JULY, 2016.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that, the purpose of the petition is served. The writ petition as such is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
2 wp 3257.15
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/July 16
Prasanna S. Mishrikotkar
Union of India
K. K. Sonawane
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
