The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a notice regarding garden development, holding the grievance did not survive.
Writ petition disposed of; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 2137.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2137 OF 2015
Balasaheb Pandurang Adhav .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri R. N. Dhorde, Senior Advocate i/by Shri V. R. Dhorde,, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri M. M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 04TH JULY, 2016.
PER COURT :
. Mr. Patil, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that, tender notice with regard to development of garden impugned in the present writ petition has been cancelled by the General Body vide resolution No. 07 dated 27.02.2015..
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/July 16
Balasaheb Pandurang Adhav
The State of Maharashtra
Another
K. K. Sonawane
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
