A writ petition filed by Shiv Mangal Developers was disposed of on instructions from the AGP. The property in the petition was held not to be the subject of impugned communications. With only consequential prayers remaining, the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL3027.16.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3027 OF 2016
Shiv Mangal Developers ... Petitioner v/s State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents
Mr Mayur Khandeparkar with Mr Sheelang Shah, Mr Amar Datta, Ms Rachana Loonia i/b M/s Lex Services for Petitioner. Mr Kedar B. Dighe, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5. Mr Anoop V. Patil for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: A.S. OKA AND SMT ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI JJ.
DATE : 6TH DECEMBER 2016.
P.C. :-
to 5 states that property described in paragraph 1.1 of the Petition is
not the subject matter of the impugned communications dated 10th
May 2016 and 16th May 2016 (Exhibits H and I to the Petition). The
1 of 2
VRD
WPL3027.16.sxw
letter dated 22nd November 2016 addressed to the learned AGP by the Superintendent of Mumbai City Survey and Land Records, Mumbai is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. We accept the statements made therein. In view of the statements, the prayer clauses (a) and (b) do not survive. The other prayers are consequential prayers. Hence, by accepting the aforesaid statements made on instructions, we dispose of the Petition.
(SMT ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI J.) (A.S. OKA J.)
2 of 2
VRD
Shiv Mangal Developers
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
