The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition by noting a communication from the respondent. The petitioner was advised to challenge the communication via regular proceeding rather than the writ petition.
The writ petition was dismissed; the petitioner is free to challenge the communication through regular proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 904_wp_1536_2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1536 OF 2016
Sopariwala Exports, a registered partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act.
...Petitioner
Versus
The Collector, City of Mumabi & Ors. ...Respondents
...
Mr. Prakash Mahadik for the Petitioner.
Mr. Asif Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3-State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 5th DECEMBER, 2016.
P. C. :
Not on board. Taken on board.
petition.
1/2
Megha 904_wp_1536_2016.doc
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
2/2
Sopariwala Exports
The Collector, City of Mumabi
A.S. OKA
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
