The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted leave, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
41 WRIT PETITION NO. 2965 OF 2014
SANJIVKUMAR RAJDHARRAO MORE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Bayas Anandsing AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.M. Ganachari
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Date: March 14, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the petition
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
SANJIVKUMAR RAJDHARRAO MORE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
