Petitioners sought withdrawal of the writ petition to prefer proceedings in the Supreme Court. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Permission was granted to withdraw the petition, which was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1 WP-3028-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3028 OF 2016
Rajesh Khobragade and Anr.
.... Petitioners
versus
Union of India & Anr.
... Respondents
Mr.Jabbar Shaikh a/w Gayatri H. Nayak advocate for the Petitioners.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & A.M.BADAR, JJ. DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2016.
P.C. :
petitioners. On instructions he seeks permission to withdraw the
petition on the ground that he desires to prefer proper proceedings before the Apex Court.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Nesarikar
Rajesh Khobragade and Anr.
Union of India & Anr.
A.S. OKA
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
