The petition became infructuous, and the petitioners sought its withdrawal. The Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn without any substantive decision on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-731.16
sng
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.731 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Aasif Naradia i/b Khimani & Associates for the Petitioners. Shri Anil Yadav for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.M. BADAR, JJ DATED : 24TH NOVEMBER 2016
P.C.:
As the Petition has become infructuous, the Petitioners want to withdraw the same. Therefore, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Petitioners
Respondent No.1
A.S. Oka
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court