Disposed

Shri. Sharad Ganpat Pawar v. the Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC2 Feb 2016WP/2830/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a minor son of a deceased teacher, applied for appointment on compassionate grounds. Court directed management to decide independently within four weeks without being influenced by external directions and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Direct management to decide on compassionate appointment independently within four weeks and communicate decision in writing.

Shri. Sharad Ganpat Pawar Vs the Govt. of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp2830.15.sxw

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 2830 OF 2015

¶5

Shri Sharad Ganpat Pawar ... Petitioner V/s. The Govt. of Maharashtra & others ... Respondents

¶6

Mr. S.S. Pakale i/b. Mr. A.R. Belge for the petitioner.

¶7

Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for respondents 1 to 3. Mr. V.S. Deokar for respondents 4 and 5.

¶8

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ . 2^nd February, 2016 .

¶9

P.C.

¶10

The petitioner's contention is that his father died on 26^th September, 2007 while in service as a teacher discharging his duties with respondent school. The petitioner at that time was a minor. It was submitted by the Counsel appearing for the petitioner that the mother of the petitioner had applied earlier for appointment on compassionate ground which was turned down. After petitioner became major, he too applied for appointment on compassionate ground. The issue reached upto the higher authorities. In a communication made by Education Officer

¶11

2/2 wp2830.15.sxw

¶12

(Seconday) Zilla Parishad, Solapur dated 6^th January, 2015 (Exhibit J to the petition) the management was informed that the mother of the petitioner had recommended case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground. Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner on instructions of petitioner who is present in Court submits that petitioner had himself filed an application independently requesting for an appointment on compassionate ground.

¶13

Without expressing any opinion on the request made by the petitioner or any application filed by the petitioner with the management, we direct the management to take appropriate decision, in case the petitioner had filed application for appointment on compassionate ground strictly in accordance with the policy adopted by the State as reflected in the Government Resolutions issued in this behalf. The decisions shall be taken within four weeks from today and be communicated to the petitioner in writing.

¶14

The decision be taken without being influenced by the directions issued by the Education Officer, (Seconday) Zilla Parishad, Solapur. With aforesaid directions, Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶15

(A.A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

¶16

L.S. Panjwani, P.S.

Shri. Sharad Ganpat Pawar v. the Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Sharad Ganpat Pawar v. the Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Shankar Ramchandra Kumbhar Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Secondary and Higher Secondary School and Ors.

Dr. Shri. Nitinkumar Jagannath Ranshur Vs Mahatam Phule Agricultural University and Ors.

Dr. Madhav Rangrao Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary to Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors.

Chirag Deepak Rajpal Vs State of Maharashtra, through Dept of Caste Verification Committee and Anr.

Shri. Sharad Ganpat Pawar Vs the Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Kartik International and Ors. Vs Central Bank of India and Ors.