A writ petition for parole was filed but discharged as infructuous because the petitioner died on record.
Rule discharged; fees to be paid to counsel quantified at Rs. 2,000/-
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 276 OF 2015
Jagan Shravan Patil ... Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate appointed for the petitioner. Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
JUNE 7 , 2016.
ORAL ORDER (Per V.K. Tahilramani, J.)
Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith.
1 of 2
Rule is discharged.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 of 2
Jagan Shravan Patil
State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
