The record of the petitioner shows that he was released on furlough on 6 occasions. In 2006, when the petitioner was released on furlough, he reported back in time to the prison. In 2007, when the petitioner was released on furlough, there was overstay on his part of 42 days. However, it is seen that the petitioner reported back to the prison himself and it was not a case of being arrested by the police and being brought back to prison. In 2008, when the petitioner was released on furlough, there was delay of one day in reporting back to the prison. In 2009, when the petitioner was released on furlough, he reported back to the prison in time. In 2011, when the petitioner was released on furlough on 19th January, 2011, he reported back to the prison in time. In 2012, when the petitioner was released on furlough, he reported back to the prison after 2 days, i.e., there was overstay of two days on the part of the petitioner. It is seen that out of 6 occasions, on 3 occasions, the petitioner reported back in time and on the other 3 occasions, though there was delay on the part of the petitioner in reporting back to the prison, however, the petitioner has surrendered back to the prison on his own and it was not a case of being arrested by the police and being brought back to the prison. It is only in the year 2007 that there was delay of 42 days on the part of the petitioner in reporting back to the prison. Thereafter it is seen that the petitioner has reported back to the
