The court disposed of a contempt petition without expressing an opinion on the merits, noting a communication from the Education Officer consequent to a prior order. The petition is disposed of with liberty pursuant to para 12.
Petition disposed of with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp19.16.sxw
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 19 OF 2016
Shree Sant Pachlegaonkar Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents
Mr. K.U. Patil for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for the State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ .
16th February, 2016 .
P.C.
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has placed on record communication made by Education Officer (Secondary) dated 25th January, 2016 consequent to the order passed by this Court on 5th October, 2015.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shree Sant Pachlegaonkar Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha
State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
