The respondent court permitted the withdrawal of the criminal writ petition noted on the Board, and disposed of the matter accordingly without substantive adjudication on the merits.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition, and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.4.CWP.269.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 269 OF 2016. (Ibrahim Khan Niyamat Khan .vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati & another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. N.A. Badar, Advocate for petitioner, Mrs. S.S. Jachak, A.P.P. for respondents.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATED : APRIL 6, 2016.
Mr. N.A. Badar, learned Advocate for petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the petition inasmuch as the other petition filed by the same accused is on today's Board.
The petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
Judge
Judge
J.
Ibrahim Khan Niyamat Khan
The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati & another
B.R. Gavai
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
