Interim order seeking continuation of status quo for eight weeks to maintain pending status in a contempt petition regarding vacant apartments in writ petition No. 2569 of 2002.
Parties directed to maintain status quo for eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skc
901-WP-2569-02
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2569 OF 2002
Alhad R. Vaidya & Ors. .. Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. A. B. Tajane for Petitioners. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar -AGP for State – Respondent No. 3. Ms N. K. Singh i/b. India Law Alliance for Respondent Nos. 5 to 8.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE: 14 JULY 2016
P.C :
1] By this praecipe, learned counsel for the petitioners seek continuation of interim order dated 28 January 2002 for a period of eight weeks. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the interim order was no longer in operation and as of now, no apartments are vacant. Learned counsel for the petitioners however points out that the petitioners have filed a contempt petition, which is since pending. In such circumstances, the parties are directed to maintain status quo for a period of eight weeks.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
Chandka
1/1
Alhad R. Vaidya & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
