Disposed

Shri. Ankush Murlidhar Mukhekar and Anr. v. Shri. Balasaheb Narayan Jadhav and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Jul 2016CAW/1545/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Leave was granted to withdraw certain applications before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune. Consequently, the subsequent order of the Commissioner was set aside and the main civil application was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw application dated 20 June 2016; order of Joint Charity Commissioner dated 21 June 2016 set aside; Civil Application disposed of.

Shri. Ankush Murlidhar Mukhekar and Anr. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

DSS

¶2

caw-1545-16

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1545 OF 2016

¶5

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 7026 OF 2016

¶7

Ankush N. Mukhekar and anr. .. Applicants

¶8

vs.

¶9

Balasaheb N. Jadhav and ors. .. Respondents

¶10

Mr. A.V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Abhay Anturkar and Mr. Tanaji Mhatugade for the Applicants.

¶11

Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh for Respondent Nos.1,2,4,5,6,7,11 to 16 and 18 to 23.

¶12

Mr. Dilip Bodake a/w. Mr. Sharad Bhosale for Respondent Nos.24.2,24.3,24.6,24.7, 24.9 and 24.10.

¶13

Ms Vaishali Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent No.26-State.

¶14

Mr. Vikram N. Walawalkar i/b Mr. Gajanan D. Shinde for the Interveners.

¶15

CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. (IN CHAMBER) DATE : 11 JULY 2016.

¶16

P.C. :-

¶17

1] The Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune has filed an affidavit, which is taken on record.

¶18

2] Mr. Dilip Bodake, learned counsel for respondent Nos.24.2,

¶19

24.3, 24.6, 24.7, 24.9 and 24.10, on basis of instructions, makes a statement that the application dated 20 June 2016 made by some of

¶20

the respondents before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune will be withdrawn. In fact, he seeks leave to withdraw the said application,

1/2

DSS

caw-1545-16

at this stage itself. Mr. Bodake seeks such leave, as, according to him, the respondents had filed an application dated 20 June 2016, only in order to seek proper and effective compliance of this Court's order dated 16 June 2016. Further, Mr. Bodake points out that this Court, in its order dated 28 June 2016 has also approved the appointments of Mr. N.H. Jadhav and Mr. M.S. M.Y. Rachbhare in order to supervise the election process.

¶25

3] Considering the aforesaid, leave is granted to withdraw the application dated 20 June 2016 and the said application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. In view of the withdrawal of application dated 20 June 2016, obviously, the order dated 21 June 2016 made by the Joint Charity Commissioner does not survive and in any case, even the same is formally set aside.

¶26

4] In view of the aforesaid, no further orders are necessary to be passed in Civil Application No. 1545 of 2016, which is hereby disposed of. Accordingly, the same is disposed of.

¶27

(M. S. SONAK, J.)

¶28

dinesh

¶29

2/2

Shri. Ankush Murlidhar Mukhekar and Anr. v. Shri. Balasaheb Narayan Jadhav and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Ankush Murlidhar Mukhekar and Anr. v. Shri. Balasaheb Narayan Jadhav and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pandurang Cindhu Choudhari Vs Kanha Sitaram Patil (Since Decd) through Lrs. and Anr.

Mrs. Padma Venkatesh Naidu (Orig. Respondents) and Ors. Vs Mr. Venkatesh Muthalgar Subbiah (Orig. Petitioners) and Ors.

Kumbhi Kasari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, Kudtre Vs the Managing Director, Food Corporation of India and Ors.

Shankar Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Vs Shri Harshavardhan Patil, Hon'Ble Minister for Cooperation and Ors.

M/S. Sadhana Construction Company, through Prop. Jagdish Sharadaprasad Tiwari Vs Mr. Dilip Mhasu Wankhede and Ors.

Nimsakhar Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha and Anr. Vs Shri Harshavardhan Patil, Hon'Ble Minister for Cooperation and Ors.