Writ petition for withdrawal due to non-survival of cause of action. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the petition as withdrawn on the grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-2483-06.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2483 OF 2006
Chitrali Properties Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. S. C. Kakane, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2016.
P.C. :
Not on Board. Mentioned, taken on Board.
2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action for filing this petition is not surviving. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Chitrali Properties Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
