In a contempt petition challenging a prior writ petition order, the court noted compliance by the State via an October 2016 order. Disposed of the petition without permitting substantive examination of the new proposal regarding the compliance order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47-cp-168-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.168 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.863 OF 2014
Shiv Maharashtra Education Trust V/s. Shri.nandkumar & Ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Ms.Gauri Raghuwanshi i/by Mr.Ratnesh Dube for the Petitioner.
Mr.P.P. Kakade, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 22nd NOVEMBER 2016
P.C.
( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
(SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
page 1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
order dated 13th April 2015Referred¶1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiv Maharashtra Education Trust
Shri. Nandkumar
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
