The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution after the petitioner's lawyers informed the Registry of their withdrawal and the petitioner did not pursue the matter further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-WP.2473.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2473 OF 2013
Ms. Louise Dorothy Crasto } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Abhishekh Khare i/b. M/s. Khare Legal chambers for the Petitioner.
Ms. Akshita Mehta i/b. M/s. Thakordas and Co. for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2016
P.C. :-
It appears that on 27th March, 2014, the present set of
Advocates informed the Registry and in the presence of the Petitioner that they do not desire to continue as the Advocates. There is a record of this by the Additional Prothonotary and Senior Master.
Page 1 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
25-WP.2473.2013.doc
cannot complain if we dismiss the Petition for want of prosecution for, all remedies to recover the fees and in accordance with law are available and intact. The Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
Louise Dorothy Crasto
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
