This order dismissed a writ petition in a single-line disposition stating that disputed factual questions are not for writ jurisdiction and alternate ordinary remedies are available.
petition rejected, petitioner relegated to ordinary remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP239-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.239/2016 (Mohammad Hanif Sheikh Hamid and ors. .vs. The Deputy Director of
Education, Amravati and others. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. P.S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Nikhil Joshi, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. K.S. Malokar, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : August 29, 2016.
The petition involves various disputed questions of facts which cannot be gone into the writ jurisdiction of this Court.
In any case the petitioner has alternate remedy available in ordinary law.
In that view of the matter, the petition is rejected relegating the petitioner to the ordinary remedy available in law.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
2
WP239-16.odt
Certificate
I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.
Uploaded by : R.G. Halwai.
Uploaded on: 30.8.2016
Mohammad Hanif Sheikh Hamid and ors.
The Deputy Director of Education, Amravati and others.
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
