A short order rejecting a contempt petition alleging an erroneous statement about the existence of a grievance cell at the respondent University.
Contempt petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP280-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Contempt Petition No. 280/2016 in
Writ Petition No.952/2016 (Kailash Vitthalrao Bisandre .vs. Dr. Sidharth Vinayak Kane, ViceChancellor, R.T.M. Nagpur University, Nagpur )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. I. G. Meshram, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. A.S. Bhandarkar, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : August 29, 2016.
The petitioner has filed the contempt petition alleging that though there is no grievance cell available with the respondent-University, an erroneous statement was made before this Court on 4.4.2016.
In the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent-University, it is specifically stated that the grievance cell exists and is consisting of the Pro-Vice Chancellor, Registrar and one Shri Gulabrao Thakre. It is also specifically stated that the petitioner has in fact not approached the grievance cell.
In that view of the matter, there is no merit in the contempt petition. Contempt petition is rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
2
CP280-16.odt
Certificate
I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.
Uploaded by : R.G. Halwai.
Uploaded on: 30.8.2016
Kailash Vitthalrao Bisandre
Dr. Sidharth Vinayak Kane
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
