Disposed
Shaikh Mumtaz Shaikh Ismaile Qureshi v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/235/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
wp 235.16.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cr wp 235.16.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.235 OF 2016
Shaikh Mumtaz w/o Shaikh Ismail Qureshi Petitioner Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
Mr. R.A. Jaiswal advocate for the petitioner(appointed) Mr. K.S.Patil APP for Respondents
CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J & K.L. WADANE, JJ (Date : 6th APRIL, 2016.)
PER COURT :-
1 Learned APP informs that the petitioner has been granted extension in parole for a period of 30 days, by order dated 23.2.2016. A copy of the order is placed on record and marked Exhibit 'X' for identification.
2 Since the petitioner has been granted extension of parole, the apprehension expressed by her in respect of imposition of punishment for overstay beyond the period prescribed under the initial order, renders unfounded. In the event of occurrence of any cause, the petitioner shall have liberty to approach the Court. It is noticed that the punishment of removal of her name from
{2} cr wp 235.16.odt
remission register for a period of 175 days, has been proposed, however, no punishment has yet been imposed. The punishing authority will surely take note of the order passed by the authority granting extension of parole on 23.2.2016.
3 In the event of occurrence of any cause, keeping option of the petitioner to approach this Court open, writ petitions stands disposed of.
(K.L. WADANE, J) (R.M.BORDE, J)
vbd
Shaikh Mumtaz w/o Shaikh Ismail Qureshi
The State of Maharashtra and others
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court