Dismissed

Bhaurao S/O. Suryabhan Nage v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC5 Apr 2016APPLN/1043/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC, the applicant challenged proceedings due to a discrepancy in the vehicle's registration number in the FIR. The court rejected the application, finding the investigation doubt-worthy not established and the allegations constituting an offence requiring enquiry.

What did the court decide?

The criminal application was rejected and the proceedings were allowed to continue.

Bhaurao S/O. Suryabhan Nage Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

Cr.Appln.1043/16

¶2

- 1 -

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1043/2016

¶6

Bhaurao Suryabhan Nage.

¶7

...Applicant..

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Maharashtra & another.

¶10

...Respondent...

¶11

 .....

¶12

Shri P.D. Kale, Advocate for applicant.
Shri M.M. Nerlikar, APP for respondent no.1.

¶13

 .....

¶14

CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
 K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 05.04.2016

¶15

ORDER :

¶16

1] Perused the First Information Report.

¶17

2] It is contended that there is discrepancy in respect

¶18

of mentioning of the registration number of the vehicle,
which creates a doubt in respect of complicity of the

¶19

accused and the vehicle owned by him and involved in the
alleged crime. The vehicle registration number that was

¶20

disclosed at the later point of time is substantially the
same. Apart from this, there is no controversy in

¶21

Cr.Appln.1043/16

¶22

respect of identity of the accused, which has been
disclosed in the First Information Report lodged at the
earliest point of time. The allegations contained in the
First Information Report do constitute an offence, which
needs to be enquired into. There is no merit in the
application. The application stands rejected.

¶23

 (K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)

¶24

ndk/ cr541616.doc

Bhaurao S/O. Suryabhan Nage v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhaurao S/O. Suryabhan Nage v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriram Laxman Bangar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jakir Maheboobkhan Pathan. Vs the State of Maharashtra.

Anil Nana Yelmame Vs State of Maharashtra

Ashok S/O Pundlikrao Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Mehboob Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shaikh Nabab Shaikh Khajamiya and Other Vs the State of Maharashtra