The single-judge bench directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, to decide an application filed by respondent No. 5 and communicate the decision expeditiously within six weeks.
Direction to the Education Officer to decide the application and communicate the decision within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2341.16wp
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
|
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions |
and Registrar's orders
|
|
|
Court's or Judge's orders
|
|
_|
|---|---|
WRIT PETITION NO. 2341 OF 2016
VITHAL WAMANRAO ARYA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Ashtekar R.k.
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.B.
Yawalkar.
...
CORAM:S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Dated: APRIL 06, 2016
Petition is disposed of with
direction to the Education officer
(Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad to
take decision on the proposal /
application filed by the respondent No.5
to the said authority, as expeditiously as
possible, if already not decided; however,
within six weeks from today, on its own
merits and communicate the decision so
2341.16wp
2
taken to the respondent No.5.
Parties to act upon authenticated
copy of this order.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J)(S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the education officer should decide the application/expediently.
Whether the decision should be communicated within six weeks.
Vithal Wamanrao Arya
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court