Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition. The accompanying civil application was disposed of.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed; civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1855.14wp
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ 16 WRIT PETITION NO. 1855 OF 2014 WITH CA/9694/2015 IN WP/1855/2014
VIKAS UTTAMRAO ZADPIDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.R.O. Awsarmol
h/f Smt.Khodse Varsha B. & smt. Manisha
Dhule Patil
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.B.V. Virdhe.
Advocate for R.Nos.4 & 5: Mr.M.P. Gude.
...
CORAM:S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Dated: APRIL 06, 2016
…
Learned Counsel for the petitioner,
on instructions, seeks permission to
withdraw the petition.
2Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Civil Application does not survive and
stands disposed of.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J)(S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
VIKAS UTTAMRAO ZADPIDE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court