The High Court directed concerned authorities to dispose of the petitioner's parole application expeditiously while a police report from Gujarat was awaited. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Parole application to be disposed of expeditiously by concerned authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 2.cr.wp.2333.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2333 OF 2016
Santosh Mohan Rajput
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Ms. Rohini Dandekar Advocate appointed for Petitioner Mrs. U.V.Kejriwal A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : AUGUST 10, 2016
P.C.:
2 The petitioner preferred an application for parole on the ground of illness of his wife. The application was preferred on 14.3.2016. The grievance of the petitioner is that the police report is not received. The learned A.P.P. states that as the petitioner wanted to spend his parole period in the State of Gujarat, report was called from the State of Gujarat. The said report which is dated 24.6.2016, is received by the office of the Divisional Commissioner on 4.7.2016. In this view of the
1 of 2
jdk 2 2.cr.wp.2333.16.doc
matter, the only direction which we feel it necessary is that the application of the petitioner for parole, be disposed of as expeditiously as possible by the concerned authorities.
4 Office to communicate this order to the petitioner who is in Nashik Road Central Prison, Nashik.
5 Legal fees to be paid to the appointed advocate is quantified at Rs.2500/-.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's parole application should be disposed of expeditively pending receipt of police report from Gujarat.
Santosh Mohan Rajput
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatskar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
