Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner remained absent and repeatedly sought adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-WP.2301.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2301 OF 2013
Mrs. Syed Najma Begum } W/o. Late Jaffer Hussain } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.} Respondents
Mr.B.K.Mishra for the Petitioner absent .
Ms. Geeta Shastri – Addl. Government Pleader with Mr. Amit Shastri – AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. Jagdish G. Reddy (Aradwad) for Respondent No. 4.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2016
P.C. :-
Mr. B. K. Mishra Advocate for the Petitioner and the
Petitioner both are absent. The Writ Petition was placed on several occasions prior to this date and for some reason or the other adjournment was sought by the Petitioner. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Mrs. Syed Najma Begum
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadikari
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
