High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a writ petition regarding non-functional power-line supply after the Respondent assured rectification by August 2016, thereby redressing the grievance.
Grievance held redressed based on undertaking by Respondent No.4; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
28 WRIT PETITION NO. 2278 OF 2016
VAIJANTA RAJA SALVE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.D.Biradar
AGP for respondent No.1: Mr. A.R. Kale Advocate for respondent No.2 & 3: Mr.A. Kshirsagar h/f Mrs. M.A. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No.4 :Mr.P.B. Paithankar
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: June 13, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4, on instructions states that, the grievance of the petitioner in respect of supply of electricity will be redressed and the power-line would be made functional by the end of August, 2016.
2 In view of this statement, the grievance raised by the petitioner, in the instant petition stands redressed.
3 The writ petition stands disposed of.
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
VAIJANTA RAJA SALVE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
