Petitioners withdrew the writ petition after respondents assured grievance consideration regarding temporary accommodation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
940 WRIT PETITION NO. 2318 OF 2016
RATNABAI POONAM PAWAR AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Sanket S Kulkarni
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. S. S. Dande
Advocate for Respondent No.3: Mr. N. N. Desale
CORAM: R. M. BORDE &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE:
10th June, 2016
ORDER:
The learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners states that since the respondents have
assured the petitioners to consider their grievance in
respect of temporary accommodation, there is no need to
prosecute the petition further and he wants to withdraw
the petition. In view of the statement made, the writ
petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
JPC
1/1
Ratnabai Poonam Pawar and Others
The State of Maharashtra and Others
R. M. Borde
K. L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court