Dismissed

Parubai Sadashiv Ghevare Died Though Lrs Vasant Sadashiv Ghevare and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC8 Jul 2016WP/2272/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing a Sub Divisional Officer to re-determine land acquisition compensation under Section 28-A within six months after providing an opportunity of hearing to all parties.

What did the court decide?

Directed a Sub Divisional Officer to decide the acquisition compensation application within six months.

Parubai Sadashiv Ghevare Died Though Lrs Vasant Sadashiv… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

- 1 -

¶2

WP 2272/16

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.2272/2016

¶6

Parubai Sadashiv Ghevare,
died, through L.Rs. Vasant
Sadashiv Ghevare & others.

¶7

...Petitioners..

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Maharashtra & others.

¶10

...Respondents...

¶11

 .....

¶12

Shri P.B. Rakhunde, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri M.B. Bharaswadkar, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 3.
Shri S.G. Bhalerao, Advocate for respondent no.2.

¶13

 .....

¶14

CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
 K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 08.07.2016

¶15

ORDER :

¶16

1]This petition can be disposed of with a direction to

¶17

the respondent no.3 or any other officer of the Revenue

¶18

Department of the rank of Sub Divisional Officer

¶19

appointed by the Collector to deal with the application

¶20

u/s 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act to decide the same

¶21

in accordance with provisions of law and after extending

¶22

an opportunity of hearing to all the parties, as

¶23

WP 2272/16

¶24

expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period
of six months from today, and it is accordingly directed.
On re-determination of the amount of compensation, if the
petitioners are held entitled to receive the enhanced
amount, the respondent no.2 shall pay the amount to the
petitioners so determined in accordance with the decision
by the Land Acquisition Officer / Sub Divisional Officer,
as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a
period of six months from the date of such determination.
2]With the directions as above, the writ petition
stands disposed of.

¶25

 (K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)

¶26

ndk/ c87167.doc

Parubai Sadashiv Ghevare Died Though Lrs Vasant Sadashiv Ghevare and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parubai Sadashiv Ghevare Died Though Lrs Vasant Sadashiv Ghevare and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Patsanstha Federation Maryadit through Its Chairman O D Koyte and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rajesh Mohanlal Shriwastav Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others

Ramesh Motor Driving School Jalgaon through Its Proprietor Sunil Devkinandan Zawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Deepak Vimalkant Pande Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Madhav Tippa Ghodke Dead through His Lrs Ratanbai and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vijay Deepchand Chordiya and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another