Deepak Vimalkant Pande v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
& another 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP 1108/16 & another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1108/2016
Deepak Vimalkant Pande.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri B.L. Sagar Killarikar, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri V.M. Kagne, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3.
Shri S.R. Vakil, Advocate for respondent no.4.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-
WRIT PETITION NO.6397/2016
Sanjay Kisan More.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri B.L. Sagar Killarikar, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri A.R. Kale, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3.
Shri S.V. Adwant, Advocate for respondent no.4.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 08.07.2016
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
ORDER :
WP 1108/16 & another
- 2 -
1]An affidavit has been presented on behalf of
respondent no.4 – bank contending therein that the
petitioners have already handed over the possession of
the premises and that the bank has in turn further handed
over the possession to the auction purchasers. The
possession receipt issued by the petitioners is placed on
record at Exhibit R-1.
2]In this view of the matter, the grievance raised in
these petitions does not deserve consideration. The writ
petitions stand disposed of.
ndk/ c87168.doc
Deepak Vimalkant Pande
Sanjay Kisan More
The State of Maharashtra
Bank
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court