The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted by the court. The writ petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-WP.2187.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2187 OF 2013
Baba Trading and Anr. } Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Harsh Behary i/b. M/s. Maniar Shrivastava Associates for the Petitioners.
Mr.J.S.Saluja – AGP for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. S. S. Patwardhan i/b. Mr. Ajit M. Savagave for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2016
P.C. :-
The Petitioners' Advocate seeks leave to withdraw the
Writ Petition. Leave granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Ad-interim/interim order, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Baba Trading and Anr.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
S. C. Dharmadhikari
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
