IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to petitioner and advocate absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19-WP.2180.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2180 OF 2013
The Association of Hospitals } Mumbai and Anr. } Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. } Respondents
M/s. KPMC Legal – Advocate for the Petitioner absent .
Ms. P. H. Kantharia – Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
Mr. Chetan Kapadia with Ms. H. S. Khowale and Ms. J. Garde i/b. M/s.Nankani and Associates for Respondent No. 5.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2016
P.C. :-
The Petitioner and the Advocate both are absent
though their names are correctly displayed on the Board. The Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
The Association of Hospitals Mumbai and Anr.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
S. C. Dharmadhikari
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
