The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition after finding that the petitioner was making repeated ad interim adjournments without valid grounds, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. The rule was discharged with no costs.
Writ petition dismissed; rule discharged; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
204 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2170 OF 2007
VINITA REALTORS PVT LTD. VERSUS
THE CHIEF ENGINEER M S E DISTRIBUTION CO LTD. ANR
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V.S. Deshmukh, Adv. h/f. Mr. A B Kale AGP for Respondents: V.C. Patil, Adv. h/f. Mr. S.M. Godsay.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 1ST AUGUST , 2016.
PER COURT:
1] On 5th July, 2016, we had passed the following order :-
"We have adjourned the matter on atleast 4 occasions at the behest of the petitioner. Today also, adjournment is sought on the ground that instructions are not received. The petitioner has had the advantage of an interim order of this Court. If the matter is not worked out on the next date, the court would be constrained to dismiss the matter"
2] Today also, learned counsel for the petitioner states that no instructions are being received. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of that, writ petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. No costs.
[K.K. SONAWANE] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Vinita Realtors Pvt Ltd
The Chief Engineer M S E Distribution Co Ltd
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
