Dismissed
Shree Narmada Architectural Systems Ltd. v. Uco Bank and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/2124/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 /1
Nalawade
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITON NO. 2124 OF 2016
Narmda Architectural Systems Ltd.
..Petitioner.
vs.
UCO Bank and anr.
...Respondents.
Miss. Kausar Banatwala i/by Tushar Goradia for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM :ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.S. GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 13th December, 2016
ORDER:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. Petition is disposed off as withdrawn with liberty.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Narmda Architectural Systems Ltd.
UCO Bank
Anoop V. Mohta
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court