Allowed the application in the interest of justice and sufficient cause having been shown. Listed the matter for final hearing on a yearwise basis.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Matter listed for final hearing yearwise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CAW 2975-16.doc-7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2975 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2493 OF 2006
Satish Laxman Gawate. ] … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ] … Respondents
Mr. A. S. Kalekar i/b Mr. Jaydeep Deo for Applicant. Mr. V. N. Sagare, AGP for Respondents.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA & A. S. GADKARI, JJ. DATE :- DECEMBER 09, 2016
ORDER :-
(A. S. GADKARI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
URS 1 of 1
Satish Laxman Gawate
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
A. S. Gadkari
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
