The High Court of Judicature at Bombay permitted withdrawal of criminal writ petition for quashment. The court reserved rights to apply for discharge and directed the trial court to decide such an application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
901wp2042-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 2042 OF 2016
Mr. Majid Abdul Gaffar Mogal & Ors. … Petitioners.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents.
Mr. K. B. Rajput, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND Ms.NUTAN D.SARDESSAI,JJ.
DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2016 P.C. :
1 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, after arguing the matter for some time and after taking instructions from his client, who is present in the court, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to take out application for discharge before the trial court at an appropriate stage.
2 Allowed to be withdrawn.
3 The Petition is disposed of by reserving the right of the petitioners to take out application for discharge. If such an
1/2
Borey
901wp2042-16.odt
spb/
application is made, it shall be decided expeditiously by the trial court being uninfluenced by the fact that the writ petition for quashing has been withdrawn by the petitioners.
(Ms.NUTAN D.SARDESSAI,J) (V.M.KANADE,J)
2/2
Borey
Mr. Majid Abdul Gaffar Mogal & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
V. M. KANADE
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
